2001 • Audi
Cabriolet
Audi Cabriolet 1.8 20V (125 Hp) 2001Overall Score59.25/100
2001 Audi Cabriolet vs 2001 Ford Puma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.7 16V (125 Hp) 2001Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CabrioletSpecificationFord Puma
AudiMakeFord
CabrioletModelPuma
2001Model year2001
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats2+2
2Doors3
Performance
Audi CabrioletSpecificationFord Puma
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
195 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1679 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
173 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CabrioletSpecificationFord Puma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank42 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
9 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CabrioletSpecificationFord Puma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi CabrioletSpecificationFord Puma
4366 mmLength3984 mm
1716 mmWidth1674 mm
1379 mmHeight1345 mm
1370 KgWeight1040 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Audi Cabriolet and 2001 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…