2003 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 2003Overall Score47.25/100
2003 Ford Puma vs 2003 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.4 HDi (68 Hp) 2003Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen C3
FordMakeCitroen
PumaModelC3
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen C3
11,9 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
180 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
90 HPPower68 HP
125 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationCitroen C3
3984 mmLength3850 mm
1674 mmWidth1667 mm
1345 mmHeight1529 mm
1035 KgWeight1022 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2460 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Puma and 2003 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…