2003 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.4 HDi (68 Hp) 2003Overall Score46.25/100
2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Ford Puma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 2003Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationFord Puma
CitroenMakeFord
XsaraModelPuma
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors3
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationFord Puma
16,7 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
164 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
68 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationFord Puma
DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationFord Puma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationFord Puma
4167 mmLength3984 mm
1698 mmWidth1674 mm
1405 mmHeight1345 mm
1120 KgWeight1035 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…