DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Hyundai Lavita vs 2003 Ford Puma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HyundaiMakeFord
LavitaModelPuma
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors3

Performance

17,9 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
157 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
82 HPPower90 HP
187 NmTorque125 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength3984 mm
1740 mmWidth1674 mm
1635 mmHeight1345 mm
1370 KgWeight1035 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Hyundai Lavita and 2003 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…