DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Ford Mustang vs 1998 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLand Rover
MustangModelRange Rover
1993Model year1998
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
220 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4552 cc
228 HPPower218 HP
407 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank100 lt
20 ltUrban consumption23,9 lt
12 ltExtra-urban consumption12,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/55 ZR16Tyre size255/65R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4560 mmLength4713 mm
1735 mmWidth1853 mm
1320 mmHeight1817 mm
1380 KgWeight2120 Kg
2555 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Ford Mustang and 1998 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…