DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1993 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelMustang
1998Model year1993
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4552 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
218 HPPower228 HP
400 NmTorque407 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank58 lt
23,9 ltUrban consumption20 lt
12,2 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/65R16Tyre size225/55 ZR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4560 mm
1853 mmWidth1735 mm
1817 mmHeight1320 mm
2120 KgWeight1380 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2555 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Range Rover and 1993 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…