DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Lincoln Mark vs 1993 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeFord
MarkModelMustang
1996Model year1993
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
290 HPPower228 HP
400 NmTorque407 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption20 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16 VTyre size225/55 ZR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5265 mmLength4560 mm
1900 mmWidth1735 mm
1361 mmHeight1320 mm
1715 KgWeight1380 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2555 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Lincoln Mark and 1993 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…