DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Mustang vs 2005 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeToyota
MustangModel4runner
2003Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4664 cc
263 HPPower235 HP
302 NmTorque434 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank87 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4653 mmLength4800 mm
1857 mmWidth1875 mm
1350 mmHeight1750 mm
1550 KgWeight2000 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Mustang and 2005 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…