DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Lexus LX vs 2003 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus LX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LexusMakeFord
LXModelMustang
2005Model year2003
SUVBody typeCabriolet
8Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,5 s
0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4664 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
235 HPPower263 HP
434 NmTorque302 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
96 ltFuel tank59 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
12,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
15,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
275/60 R18Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4890 mmLength4653 mm
1940 mmWidth1857 mm
1850 mmHeight1350 mm
2450 KgWeight1550 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Lexus LX and 2003 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus LX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…