DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lincoln Aviator vs 2003 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Aviator

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeFord
AviatorModelMustang
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
7Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
180 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
306 HPPower263 HP
406 NmTorque302 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank59 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/65 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4909 mmLength4653 mm
1877 mmWidth1857 mm
1800 mmHeight1350 mm
2240 KgWeight1550 Kg
2889 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lincoln Aviator and 2003 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Aviator leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…