DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Mustang vs 2003 Lincoln Aviator Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Aviator

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLincoln
MustangModelAviator
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
263 HPPower306 HP
302 NmTorque406 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank85 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4653 mmLength4909 mm
1857 mmWidth1877 mm
1350 mmHeight1800 mm
1550 KgWeight2240 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2889 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Mustang and 2003 Lincoln Aviator approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Aviator leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…