DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Harrier vs 2005 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
HarrierModelMondeo
2004Model year2005
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,4 s
0 km/hTop speed243 km/h
2994 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
220 HPPower226 HP
304 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption14,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,9 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4731 mm
1845 mmWidth1812 mm
1680 mmHeight1429 mm
1830 KgWeight1420 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Harrier and 2005 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…