DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Alphard vs 2005 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeFord
AlphardModelMondeo
2004Model year2005
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,4 s
0 km/hTop speed243 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
220 HPPower226 HP
304 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption14,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,9 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/40 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4731 mm
1830 mmWidth1812 mm
1935 mmHeight1429 mm
—Weight1420 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Alphard and 2005 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…