DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Maverick vs 1996 Mitsubishi Montero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
MaverickModelMontero
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h18,0 s
160 km/hTop speed151 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
124 HPPower133 HP
197 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,8 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/80 R15 RTyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4610 mm
1735 mmWidth1775 mm
1810 mmHeight1735 mm
1750 KgWeight1830 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Maverick and 1996 Mitsubishi Montero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…