DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Montero vs 1996 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
MonteroModelMaverick
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
151 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
133 HPPower124 HP
280 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size215/80 R15 R
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4585 mm
1775 mmWidth1735 mm
1735 mmHeight1810 mm
1830 KgWeight1750 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Montero and 1996 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…