DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda MPV vs 1996 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
MPVModelMaverick
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
165 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
115 HPPower124 HP
277 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size215/80 R15 R
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength4585 mm
1825 mmWidth1735 mm
1750 mmHeight1810 mm
1775 KgWeight1750 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda MPV and 1996 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…