DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Maverick vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MaverickSpecificationMG ZS
FordMakeMG
MaverickModelZS
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford MaverickSpecificationMG ZS
13,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
166 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1989 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
124 HPPower117 HP
175 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MaverickSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MaverickSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15STyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford MaverickSpecificationMG ZS
4394 mmLength4520 mm
1781 mmWidth1700 mm
1722 mmHeight1390 mm
1470 KgWeight1125 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Maverick and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…