DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationFord Maverick
MGMakeFord
ZSModelMaverick
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationFord Maverick
9,0 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
19 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
117 HPPower124 HP
160 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationFord Maverick
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationFord Maverick
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size225/70 R15S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationFord Maverick
4520 mmLength4394 mm
1700 mmWidth1781 mm
1390 mmHeight1722 mm
1125 KgWeight1470 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…