DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2004 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeFord
RezzoModelMaverick
2005Model year2004
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
111 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
121 HPPower124 HP
176 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
9 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size225/70 R15S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4394 mm
1750 mmWidth1781 mm
1580 mmHeight1722 mm
1392 KgWeight1470 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Daewoo Rezzo and 2004 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…