DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Maverick vs 2000 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
MaverickModelSharan
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
166 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1989 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
124 HPPower110 HP
175 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15STyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4394 mmLength4620 mm
1781 mmWidth1810 mm
1722 mmHeight1730 mm
1470 KgWeight1665 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Maverick and 2000 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…