2000 • Seat
Alhambra
Seat Alhambra 1.9 TDI (110 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
2000 Seat Alhambra vs 2000 Ford Maverick Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Maverick
Ford Maverick 2.0 i 16V (124 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Ford Maverick
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat AlhambraSpecificationFord Maverick
SeatMakeFord
AlhambraModelMaverick
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Seat AlhambraSpecificationFord Maverick
16,4 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
172 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
110 HPPower124 HP
235 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat AlhambraSpecificationFord Maverick
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Seat AlhambraSpecificationFord Maverick
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size225/70 R15S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Seat AlhambraSpecificationFord Maverick
4617 mmLength4394 mm
1810 mmWidth1781 mm
1728 mmHeight1722 mm
1754 KgWeight1470 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2619 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Seat Alhambra and 2000 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…