DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Subaru Forester vs 2000 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeFord
ForesterModelMaverick
1999Model year2000
CrossoverBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
178 km/hTop speed166 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1989 cc
125 HPPower124 HP
184 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size225/70 R15S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4394 mm
1735 mmWidth1781 mm
1595 mmHeight1722 mm
1440 KgWeight1470 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Subaru Forester and 2000 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…