2014 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi (163 Hp) 2014Overall Score68.5/100
2014 Ford Kuga vs 2014 Opel Cascada Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 2.0 CDTI (165 Hp) 2014Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationOpel Cascada
FordMakeOpel
KugaModelCascada
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationOpel Cascada
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
198 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
163 HPPower165 HP
340 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationOpel Cascada
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationOpel Cascada
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationOpel Cascada
4524 mmLength4696 mm
1838 mmWidth1839 mm
1701 mmHeight1443 mm
1692 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2695 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Ford Kuga and 2014 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…