DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volvo V60 vs 2014 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V60SpecificationFord Kuga
VolvoMakeFord
V60ModelKuga
2014Model year2014
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V60SpecificationFord Kuga
9,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque340 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V60SpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V60SpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V60SpecificationFord Kuga
4635 mmLength4524 mm
1825 mmWidth1838 mm
1484 mmHeight1701 mm
1731 KgWeight1692 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volvo V60 and 2014 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…