2014 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 2.0 CDTI (165 Hp) 2014Overall Score67.75/100
2014 Opel Cascada vs 2014 Ford Kuga Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi (163 Hp) 2014Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Kuga
OpelMakeFord
CascadaModelKuga
2014Model year2014
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Kuga
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
212 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
165 HPPower163 HP
350 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel CascadaSpecificationFord Kuga
4696 mmLength4524 mm
1839 mmWidth1838 mm
1443 mmHeight1701 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1692 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Opel Cascada and 2014 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…