DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Kuga vs 2016 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationHonda FIT
FordMakeHonda
KugaModelFIT
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationHonda FIT
12,7 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
120 HPPower110 HP
270 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationHonda FIT
DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
60 ltFuel tank32 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationHonda FIT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
235/50 R18Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationHonda FIT
4531 mmLength3955 mm
1838 mmWidth1695 mm
1703 mmHeight1525 mm
1591 KgWeight1080 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Kuga and 2016 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…