DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford KA vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationFord Kuga
FordMakeFord
KAModelKuga
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Ford KASpecificationFord Kuga
—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
110 HPPower120 HP
146 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationFord Kuga
Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption4,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationFord Kuga
4254 mmLength4531 mm
1695 mmWidth1838 mm
1460 mmHeight1703 mm
1032 KgWeight1591 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford KA and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…