DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda FIT vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationFord Kuga
HondaMakeFord
FITModelKuga
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationFord Kuga
—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
110 HPPower120 HP
134 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationFord Kuga
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
32 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption4,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationFord Kuga
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size235/50 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationFord Kuga
3955 mmLength4531 mm
1695 mmWidth1838 mm
1525 mmHeight1703 mm
1080 KgWeight1591 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda FIT and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…