2016 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.5 TDCI (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
2016 Ford Kuga vs 2016 Honda CR-V Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Honda
CR-V
Honda CR-V 1.6 i-DTEC (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Honda CR-V
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points.
62.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationHonda CR-V
FordMakeHonda
KugaModelCR-V
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationHonda CR-V
12,7 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
173 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
120 HPPower160 HP
270 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationHonda CR-V
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationHonda CR-V
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears9
235/50 R18Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationHonda CR-V
4531 mmLength4605 mm
1838 mmWidth2096 mm
1703 mmHeight1685 mm
1591 KgWeight1658 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2630 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Kuga and 2016 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…