DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Kuga vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationFord Figo
FordMakeFord
KugaModelFigo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationFord Figo
12,7 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
120 HPPower112 HP
270 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationFord Figo
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationFord Figo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationFord Figo
4531 mmLength3995 mm
1838 mmWidth1695 mm
1703 mmHeight1525 mm
1591 KgWeight—
2690 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Kuga and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…