DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Galaxy vs 2002 Nissan Elgrand Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
GalaxyModelElgrand
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
217 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
204 HPPower170 HP
265 NmTorque353 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4641 mmLength4740 mm
1810 mmWidth1775 mm
1732 mmHeight1940 mm
1700 KgWeight2060 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Galaxy and 2002 Nissan Elgrand approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…