DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan Elgrand vs 2002 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
ElgrandModelGalaxy
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
170 HPPower204 HP
353 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
215/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4641 mm
1775 mmWidth1810 mm
1940 mmHeight1732 mm
2060 KgWeight1700 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan Elgrand and 2002 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…