2017 • Ford
Fusion
Ford Fusion 2.5 (175 Hp) 2017Overall Score70.5/100
2017 Ford Fusion vs 2017 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Mitsubishi
Triton
Mitsubishi Triton 2.5 DI-D (136 Hp) 2017Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Ford Fusion
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
FordMakeMitsubishi
FusionModelTriton
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
217 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
175 HPPower136 HP
237 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FusionSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
4872 mmLength5280 mm
1852 mmWidth1815 mm
1478 mmHeight1780 mm
1575 KgWeight1820 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Ford Fusion and 2017 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…