DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2017 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fusion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
OutlanderModelFusion
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
150 HPPower175 HP
380 NmTorque237 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4872 mm
1810 mmWidth1852 mm
1680 mmHeight1478 mm
1600 KgWeight1575 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2017 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…