DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi Triton vs 2017 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fusion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
TritonModelFusion
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
136 HPPower175 HP
324 NmTorque237 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption11,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/70 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5280 mmLength4872 mm
1815 mmWidth1852 mm
1780 mmHeight1478 mm
1820 KgWeight1575 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi Triton and 2017 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fusion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…