DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeFord
OmegaModelFocus
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
210 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
144 HPPower147 HP
205 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank53 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4450 mm
1776 mmWidth1699 mm
1455 mmHeight1430 mm
1535 KgWeight1315 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…