DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Largo vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
LargoModelFocus
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2388 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
145 HPPower147 HP
192 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank53 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,67 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4450 mm
1745 mmWidth1699 mm
1905 mmHeight1430 mm
1620 KgWeight1315 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Largo and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…