2016 • Ford
Figo
Ford Figo 1.5 Ti-VCT (112 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TSI (125 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FigoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
FordMakeVolkswagen
FigoModelPolo
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford FigoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
112 HPPower125 HP
136 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FigoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FigoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FigoSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
3995 mmLength4390 mm
1695 mmWidth1699 mm
1525 mmHeight1467 mm
—Weight1223 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2553 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…