DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Captur vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Captur

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
CapturModelFigo
2016Model year2016
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,03 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
110 HPPower112 HP
260 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank42 lt
4,0 ltUrban consumption—
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16; 205/55 R17Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4122 mmLength3995 mm
1778 mmWidth1695 mm
1566 mmHeight1525 mm
1190 KgWeight—
2606 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Captur and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Captur leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…