DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Dacia Lodgy vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dacia Lodgy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaciaMakeFord
LodgyModelFigo
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
110 HPPower112 HP
240 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/65 R15 88TTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4498 mmLength3995 mm
1751 mmWidth1695 mm
1679 mmHeight1525 mm
1262 KgWeight—
2810 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Dacia Lodgy and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dacia Lodgy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…