DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
FigoModelScenic
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
112 HPPower110 HP
136 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption4,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption3,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size195/55 R20 95H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4406 mm
1695 mmWidth1866 mm
1525 mmHeight1653 mm
—Weight1430 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2734 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…