2016 • Ford
Figo
Ford Figo 1.5 Ti-VCT (112 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.4 CNG (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FigoSpecificationOpel Combo
FordMakeOpel
FigoModelCombo
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford FigoSpecificationOpel Combo
—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
112 HPPower120 HP
136 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FigoSpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FigoSpecificationOpel Combo
3995 mmLength4390 mm
1695 mmWidth1831 mm
1525 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
2491 mmWheelbase2755 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…