DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
FigoModelMondeo
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
112 HPPower120 HP
136 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption4,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,6 lt
—Average consumption4,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4871 mm
1695 mmWidth1852 mm
1525 mmHeight1482 mm
2491 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…