DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FigoSpecificationFord Kuga
FordMakeFord
FigoModelKuga
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Ford FigoSpecificationFord Kuga
—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
112 HPPower120 HP
136 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FigoSpecificationFord Kuga
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FigoSpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FigoSpecificationFord Kuga
3995 mmLength4531 mm
1695 mmWidth1838 mm
1525 mmHeight1703 mm
—Weight1579 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…