DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Dacia Lodgy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dacia Lodgy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeDacia
FigoModelLodgy
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,6 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
112 HPPower110 HP
136 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15 88T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4498 mm
1695 mmWidth1751 mm
1525 mmHeight1679 mm
—Weight1262 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Dacia Lodgy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dacia Lodgy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…