DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Explorer vs 2005 Nissan Patrol Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Patrol

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
ExplorerModelPatrol
2003Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4759 cc
210 HPPower245 HP
373 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption25 lt
—Extra-urban consumption14,3 lt
—Average consumption18,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/70 R 15Tyre size275/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4788 mmLength5010 mm
1783 mmWidth1930 mm
1699 mmHeight1850 mm
1891 KgWeight2574 Kg
2832 mmWheelbase2970 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Explorer and 2005 Nissan Patrol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Patrol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…