DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2003 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
MountaineerModelExplorer
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
235 HPPower210 HP
395 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank66 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/70 R15Tyre size225/70 R 15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4788 mm
1875 mmWidth1783 mm
1830 mmHeight1699 mm
—Weight1891 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2832 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mercury Mountaineer and 2003 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…