DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Patrol vs 2003 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Patrol

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
PatrolModelExplorer
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4759 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
245 HPPower210 HP
400 NmTorque373 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank66 lt
25 ltUrban consumption—
14,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
18,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
275/65 R17Tyre size225/70 R 15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5010 mmLength4788 mm
1930 mmWidth1783 mm
1850 mmHeight1699 mm
2574 KgWeight1891 Kg
2970 mmWheelbase2832 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Patrol and 2003 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Patrol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…