DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Explorer vs 2000 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExplorerModelExplorer
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
171 km/hTop speed171 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
208 HPPower208 HP
339 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank83 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
255/70 R16Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4530 mm
1790 mmWidth1790 mm
1800 mmHeight1800 mm
1670 KgWeight1670 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Explorer and 2000 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…