DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelExplorer
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed171 km/h
3900 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
190 HPPower208 HP
0 NmTorque339 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank83 lt
—Urban consumption18,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4530 mm
—Width1790 mm
—Height1800 mm
—Weight1670 Kg
—Wheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…